The performance and application result of gh203 dual sensor 203双检检波器的性能及应用
2.
Objective to comparative study of activity - based or respirator - based rate adaptive pacemakers and dual sensor rate response 目的评价单腔双感知和单腔单感知频率应答式心脏起搏器的临床效应。
3.
Abstract : objective to comparative study of activity - based or respirator - based rate adaptive pacemakers and dual sensor rate response 文摘:目的评价单腔双感知和单腔单感知频率应答式心脏起搏器的临床效应。
4.
All holter demonstrated normal pacemeker function . conclusions no significant difference between activity - based or respirtator - based and dual sensor ventricular rate adaptive pacing in clinical effects 对于心动过缓合并房颤患者，建议采用单腔单感知频率应答起搏器已能达到目的。
